Bible, Revised Standard Version
The
Revised Standard Version of the Bible is copyright © National Council of Churches of Christ in America and distributed to registered users (see
User Agreement) with their kind permission. The HTI is grateful to NCC and the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Computer Analysis of Texts (CCAT) for their permission to provide this WWW-accessible version.
John.21 Verses 15 to 19
[15] When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord; you know that I love you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs."
[16] A second time he said to him, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord; you know that I love you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep."
[17] He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, "Do you love me?" And he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." Jesus said to him, "Feed my sheep.
[18] Truly, truly, I say to you, when you were young, you girded yourself and walked where you would; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish to go."
[19] (This he said to show by what death he was to glorify God.) And after this he said to him, "Follow me."
FAQs
This translation itself is a revision of the American Standard Version (ASV) of 1901, and was intended to be a readable and literally accurate modern English translation which aimed to "preserve all that is best in the English Bible as it has been known and used through the centuries" and "to put the message of the ...
What is the controversy with the revised standard version? ›
This liberality, in the minds of its detractors, zeroed in on the translation of the word “almah” in Isaiah 7.14. What was previously translated “virgin” became in the RSV “a young woman” and thus began a firestorm of controversy from evangelical and conservative corners that has yet to abate.
Is the NRSV trustworthy? ›
Thus, with its revisions of the NRSV in accordance with the most up-to-date modern scholarship, the NRSVue has become the most historically accurate, compellingly clear, and broadly vetted English translation in the world.
Which translation of the Bible is closest to the original text? ›
The New American Standard Bible is a literal translation from the original texts, well suited to study because of its accurate rendering of the source texts. It follows the style of the King James Version but uses modern English for words that have fallen out of use or changed their meanings.
What is the most authentic version of the Bible to read? ›
NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE (NASB)
Often considered the most literal translation in use today. Focused on actual words from the transcripts rather than the thoughts behind them.
What is the most historically accurate version of the Bible? ›
The Geneva Bible is one of the most historically significant translations of the Bible into English, preceding the King James Version by 51 years.
What is the difference between KJV and RSV? ›
Thus, while clearly remaining within the linguistic tradition of the KJV, the RSV became a more accurate and faithful translation of the original Scriptures in recovering the original wording of the Hebrew and Greek texts than the KJV had been.
Who uses the revised standard version of the Bible? ›
Used broadly among biblical scholars, the NRSV was intended as a translation to serve the devotional, liturgical, and scholarly needs of the broadest possible range of Christian religious adherents.
What is the most controversial translation of the Bible? ›
The English King James Version or "Authorized Version", published in 1611, has been one of the most debated English versions.
What denomination uses NRSV? ›
A project with an “international scope,” the NIV includes translators from a wide variety of Protestant denominations, all with a collective theological commitment to “God's Word in written form.” The NRSV is more ecumenical in nature and recognized as such in Protestant, Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox ...
The NRSV-CE is based on the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), first published in 1989 by an ecumenical translation committee under the National Council of Churches in Christ U.S.A. whose stated goal was to deliver an English Bible “as literal as possible, as free as necessary” to convey accuracy and clarity from the ...
Is the NRSV a literal translation? ›
The NRSV is a mainly word- for-word translation of the Bible that is the most commonly used translation in university level Biblical studies.
What did King James take out of the Bible? ›
King James DID NOT remove books from the Bible. The original translation of the King James Version of the Bible contained exactly the same books as in the Catholic Bible. The difference was that the disputed books of the Old Testament were included as a separate section.
What is the most widely accepted Bible translation? ›
- King James Version (55%)
- New International Version (19%)
- New Revised Standard Version (7%)
- New American Bible (6%)
- The Living Bible (5%)
- All other translations (8%)
The Holy Bible: Easy-to-Read Version (ERV) is an English translation of the Bible compiled by the World Bible Translation Center. It was originally published as the English Version for the Deaf (EVD) by BakerBooks. God made the sky and earth. At first, the earth was completely empty; nothing was on the earth.
What is the difference between kjv and rsv? ›
Thus, while clearly remaining within the linguistic tradition of the KJV, the RSV became a more accurate and faithful translation of the original Scriptures in recovering the original wording of the Hebrew and Greek texts than the KJV had been.
What is the difference between the ESV and the RSV Bible? ›
The RSV (Revised Standard Version) and ESV (English Standard Version) are both translations of the Bible, but they are different in content and style. The Revised Standard Version is a more traditional translation that uses a formal language and is closer to the original Greek and Hebrew texts.
